Have a question?

How does the environmental impact of mining for clean energy metals compare to mining for coal, oil and gas?

Mining, whether for fossil fuels or metals used in clean energy technologies, has serious environmental impacts, and it’s hard to make apples-to-apples comparisons—except in terms of their impact on climate change, where clean energy mining is clearly better.

 

Updated May 11, 2026

Building clean energy technologies, like wind turbines and electric vehicles (EV), is generally more mineral intensive than using fossil fuels.1 An EV requires six times more minerals than a conventional car (not counting steel and aluminum),2 while building a wind plant uses nine times more minerals than a gas-fired plant.3
 
Certain materials are particularly critical for the clean energy transition. These include lithium used in the batteries that run EVs, rare earth minerals in the magnets that allow wind turbines to make electricity, and copper, which is used for electricity transmission.
 
“The argument could be made that, with the clean energy transition, we’re exchanging a fossil fuel-based energy system with a metals-based energy system,” says Scott Odell, a visiting assistant professor of geography at George Washington University and visiting scientist at the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative specializing in clean energy and mining.
 
As the clean energy transition moves forward, the demand for these materials will grow. Projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggest that by 2040 the demand for copper could more than double, while the demand for lithium could grow over 40 times—if, that is, the world builds enough clean energy to meet the international climate goals set by the 2015 Paris Agreement.1
 
This growing demand will mean more and larger mines, which come with real risks to communities and to biodiversity.4 So is the direct impact of all this mining for clean energy greater or smaller than the impact of mining for fossil fuels?
 
That answer, unfortunately, isn’t straightforward. Odell explains that making an apples-to-apples comparison is challenging, because methods for extracting and processing oil and coal are different than those for metal mining. Even mining two different metals—or two different deposits of the same metal—can call for different techniques. “I think if someone were to tell you one or the other is better in terms of direct impacts pound for pound, you should ask a lot of questions about how they got to that answer,” says Odell.
 
We shouldn’t discount the amount of resource extraction we already do to power our current, climate-warming energy system. The volume of fossil fuels we mine today dwarfs the amount of clean energy minerals the world will need in the future. In 2025, over 9 billion tons of coal were extracted from the ground,5 while the IEA projects that the total amount of minerals needed for clean energy technology by 2040 will be under 30 million tons.1
 
Yet even this becomes complicated when one factors in the percentage of material extracted from a mine that is actually the usable resource we want. For coal, this number can range from less than 40 to as high as 90 percent.6 In contrast, Odell explains, this number for a copper deposit may be less than one percent, meaning that much more material needs to be extracted and processed for the same volume of output.
 
But there is one area where clean energy definitely wins out: climate-warming carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The emissions created by extracting minerals from the ground are tiny compared to those created by burning fossil fuels. A 2020 report from the IEA found that for every gigawatt of a clean energy technology that’s installed, millions of tons of CO2 emissions can be avoided.7
 
Given the urgent threat of climate change, Odell says the clean energy transition is necessary. However, he cautions that we must be aware of the environmental and social impacts of mining for clean energy materials. “What I worry about is, if we don’t solve climate change with an eye towards environmental justice, we could create more social and environmental crises for ourselves down the road. So we have to do it carefully, contemplatively and intelligently.”
 
Odell believes that the way forward for clean energy mining is through three main changes. The first is to reduce consumption so we need fewer materials in the first place, such as by investing in more public transportation and walkable cities, which would reduce the need for mineral-intensive EVs. The second is to advance the circular economy, reusing minerals instead of mining new ones. “There are a lot of metals already in the system, and at the end of their lifespan, we send a lot of those to the dump,” he says.

Reducing consumption and improving recycling, however, won’t fill all of the demand for clean energy minerals. “We’re still going to need to do some digging,” says Odell. So the third change we need is to raise industry standards and adopt regulations to make sure mining is done in a more environmentally and socially responsible way.

 

Submit your own question to Ask MIT Climate

Get the latest from Ask MIT Climate monthly in your inbox

Read more Ask MIT Climate

 

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Footnotes

1 International Energy Agency: "The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions." Executive summary. Accessed May 8, 2023.

2 International Energy Agency: "Minerals used in electric cars compared to conventional cars." Updated October 26, 2022.

3 International Energy Agency: "Minerals used in clean energy technologies compared to other power generation sources." Updated October 26, 2022.

4 Sonter, Laura, et al. "Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity." Nature Communications 11 (September 2020), doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17928-5.

5 International Energy Agency: "Coal 2025." December 17, 2025.

6 U.S. Energy Information Administration: U.S. Coal Reserves. October 18, 2022.

7 International Energy Agency: "Sustainable Recovery." July 2020.

Want to learn more?

Listen to this episode of MIT's "Today I Learned: Climate" podcast on the environmental and social impacts of clean tech.

Transcriptions

LHF: [00:00:00] Hey, real quick before we begin the episode, we want to know if this podcast is making a difference for you. We have a quick survey we’d love for you to fill out. It would be so valuable to us, plus, two lucky people who fill it out will win a $50 gift certificate to Better World Books, which uses book sale profits to fund literacy programs. To take the survey, go to tilclimate.mit.edu/survey. OK back to the episode.

Hello and welcome to a bonus episode for season two of TILclimate, the podcast where you learn about climate change from real scientists and experts. I’m Laur Hesse Fisher from the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative.

In season two, we talked a lot about how different energy technologies affect climate change.

But there are other consequences to the ways we make energy today.

Some of these consequences make the news, like oil spills that kill wildlife and devastate fishing industries; and mines that have collapsed on coal miners. And then there are things we don’t hear as much about, like some parts of the U.S. where people have lit their tap water on fire because it’s been contaminated by extracting natural gas nearby; or the fact that nearly 1 in 5 long-term American coal miners have black lung disease; or that millions people die every year from air pollution created by burning fossil fuels.

Our world is now in the midst of a huge energy transition in order to emit fewer greenhouse gases. Technologies like solar panels and batteries help us slow down climate change, but they’re not inherently perfect. They also require mining and processing toxic materials which sometimes is done in a way that’s dangerous and harmful.

As we make a conscious and dedicated effort to massively scale up clean tech, we have a chance to do it in a way that protects people’s rights, health and safety. If we don’t, then even after we have clean energy, we’re still left with a lot of problems.

To help us navigate this, we spoke with MIT’s Suzanne Greene who is an expert in supply chains and understanding the impacts of where our stuff comes from.

SG: [00:02:38] I work at the MIT center for transportation and logistics, and I manage our sustainable supply chains initiative.

LHF: [00:02:45] The term “supply chain” refers to all the materials and activities that go into making, transporting, using, and disposing of something.

SG: [00:02:54] We look at the stuff that we see in our everyday life and then trace it back to the ingredients and where they come from, from all around the globe.

LHF: [00:03:04] Because of our globalized world, many products’ supply chains are far more complex than you might expect. Take for example, something that seems simple, like a banana.

SG: [00:03:19] The Center for Transportation and Logistics did a study on the banana and that was an interesting study because actually the company that we worked with, a banana company didn't fully know its own supply chain. And it's interesting because fertilizer and chemicals, that was actually one of the biggest impacts in the banana’s supply chain.

And so when you're eating a banana, you're not thinking someone mined something out of the ground for this. But that’s a fact … fertilizers, many of them are mined.

LHF: [00:03:49] From a climate change perspective, a company can look at the supply chain to understand how much greenhouse gas your product took to produce, so you can start to reduce it. But the supply chain can also help us create a more just and equitable world.

SG: [00:04:04] We as people on the planet, we might have certain ethics that we apply to the things we want in our lives that we buy, right? So we might say, you know, “we want to see fair trade and fair labor.” So that comes into the banana discussion: Was this picked by someone that's making a fair salary? We vote with our dollars, right? What are we paying for? So, in order to understand that, you need to look down the supply chain and see if all of these things agree with your ethics.

Companies do the same thing. They decide on a set of ethics, you could call it, for their suppliers and certain standards that they need to meet. And some companies are very strict on that. And others less.

LHF: [00:04:46] Yeah, this conversation extends way beyond bananas. We wanted to understand this clean energy industry that’s poised to grow very fast--and making sure we take care of our water, air, and other people as we grow this industry.

So we asked Ms. Greene about the supply chain of one of the fastest-growing energy technologies: a solar panel.

SG: [00:05:10] Okay, so solar panels have a huge variety of ingredients that need to be assembled from around the world.

Aluminum, indium, silicon, cadmium, iron, silver, copper, lead, tellurium, gallium, nickel, tin, germanium, selenium, and zinc.  So all of these things need to be gathered, they need to be dug out of the earth.

How many of th ose have you heard of?

LHF (from interview): [00:05:37] Ah, five? I don't know.

SG: [00:05:39] Yeah, so there's some major things, ™right? There's aluminum, And then silicon is maybe the thing we most associate with solar panels.

LHF (from interview): [00:05:46] Yeah

SG: [00:05:46] So that's like sand. So, that sounds more innocent than some of the other things that are quite rare. In 90% of solar panels, the part that actually turns light into electricity--what’s called the “semiconductor”--is made of silicon. Which is a material that is super abundant; in fact, silicon is the second most common element in the Earth’s crust. But you have to mine silicon, and that’s not always a clean process.

 Chemicals are often used to extract the materials and depending what part of the planet that this resource is from, the chemicals might not be properly disposed of. Right? The chemicals that are used here, we don't know if they're treated before they reach waterways. So that's a concern, right? We want to make sure that our water is clean after we extract these materials.

LHF: [00:06:41] This isn’t exclusive to solar panels. All electronics -- our computers, our cell phones, and the batteries that power them -- can involve some pretty toxic chemicals that need to be handled really carefully, which is why you cant just throw them in the trash when you’re done with them -- they need to be taken to a specific facility. And these materials are being mined all over the planet.

SG: [00:07:05] A lot of copper comes from Chile. A lot of steel comes from Australia and Brazil. A lot of the other metals and minerals are coming from Africa. There's things that are mined in Europe, you know? But a lot of it is in the developing world.

 So when we think about cobalt, for example, that's in a lot of [lithium] batteries. The biggest source of cobalt is the democratic Republic of Congo, which has a pretty bad reputation for forced labor and child labor in mines.

And not all mines in the Congo are bad, but some of them are. So that's the thing we're trying to get resolution on. Like, can you buy from the good mines and can you differentiate between them as an end user?

LHF: [00:07:50] This is a challenge already today. And as solar, wind, and battery technologies skyrocket, it’s going put a lot of pressure on mining companies to produce more. A lot more...

SG: [00:08:03] When we're thinking about electric storage batteries. So that's the batteries that we're going to need to store solar and wind energy for our grid, for our electric grids. The different metals and minerals that are involved in that—aluminum, cobalt, iron, lead, lithium, manganese, nickel—they're expecting a growth in demand by more than 1000% to reach our renewable energy goals. We're talking really big numbers.

For the mining companies, this is a huge opportunity. They are excited about the renewable energy transition. Okay. They are going to mine more. So this is a business opportunity for them.

LHF: [00:08:44] So as we build more solar and wind and batteries -- which we need to do to slow climate change -- it’s important to go into this transition with our eyes fully open to the environmental and social costs that are often hidden in the supply chains.

SG: [00:09:00] What we need to do is hold the companies that are producing these things accountable. And give them the space and the time to clean up the supply chain and make sure it fits all of our standards.

LHF: [00:09:11] Yeah, we’re all in this together. And there’s a lot more to consider in this transition than just CO2 emissions.

SG: [00:09:17] We have to think of the full equation when we're making this transition. You can't just think of eliminating coal. That's not the answer. This is about clean water, fair trade, fair labor, you know, people's rights on the planet, animals’ rights, all of these things are part of it. We want to bring everyone with us on this journey and raise everyone up together. We need to make sure we do it right this time.

LHF: [00:09:48] MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative is doing work in this area: our Here & Real program is helping coal mining communities adapt and thrive as coal leaves their counties; and our Metals, Minerals and the Environment Program, which Ms. Greene leads, is working with big mining companies to advance their sustainability practices. You can find more about these programs -- and sources for today’s episode, in our show notes.

Hey, and don’t forget to take our survey! We want to know what you think about these episodes and what we should be doing differently. Two lucky people will win a $50 gift certificate to Better World Books, which uses book sale profits to fund literacy programs. To take the survey, go to tilclimate.mit.edu/survey. Again that’s tilclimate.mit.edu/survey.

Thank you to Suzanne Greene for joining us on this bonus episode, and thank you for listening.