Have a question?

How much extra electricity would we need to switch every gas-powered car for an electric vehicle? 

A full transition to EVs will demand thousands of terawatt-hours of electricity—but with smart planning for how and when to charge these vehicles, that demand can mostly be met with power plants we’ll be building anyway.

 

January 29, 2025

By 2035, as countries implement more ambitious climate policies, electric vehicles (EVs) could account for 8 to 10 percent of global electricity demand—nearly 20 times the share they consume today.1 If all cars were swapped for electric models, that demand would increase even more. Various studies have estimated that an all-electric vehicle fleet would account for between 13 percent and 29 percent of the United States’ total electricity use.2 And if all car purchases made in the U.S. after 2035 were electric, the electricity needed to charge those vehicles could reach over 900 terawatt-hours by 2050.3 (Today, Americans consume roughly 4,000 terawatt-hours of electricity per year.4)  

Luckily, that doesn’t mean we necessarily need vast numbers of new power plants to provide EV charging. What we need to watch, explains Jessika Trancik, a professor at the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, is EVs’ impact on the demand peak. “What you're trying to avoid here is a scenario where everyone acts in unison to plug in,” she says, “especially at times when other demands for electricity are peaking.” 

Many tasks, like cooking breakfast or turning on the air conditioner on a hot day, need to happen at a specific time. This leads to times of “peak demand,” typically on hot summer afternoons, which our power grid has to be built to meet. At these times, power plants use their full capacity.

The rest of the time, we have plenty of power for what we need to accomplish, plus a nice cushion of spare capacity if demand were to suddenly spike. If we plan for it, a full transition to EVs could mostly take advantage of that spare capacity, because unlike an air conditioner, an EV can be charged conveniently at any time the vehicle is parked.

But that means, Trancik says, that we need to install chargers in the places people regularly park. She and her team have studied driving patterns to identify places where large numbers of people reliably park at different times, comparing this timing with the grid’s overall demand for electricity. The idea is to make chargers available to people at the most convenient times and places to charge their cars while spare electricity is plentiful.

One of the best locations, Trancik says, is the workplace. Installing ample chargers at workplaces will allow people to charge during the day, instead of in the evening when demand for electricity is peaking. Workplace charging also offers the benefit of using abundant solar energy while the sun is shining—electricity that might otherwise be wasted.5 

Since not every day is a workday, it’s also important to make chargers available in places where people park when they are at home, whether that’s in public street parking, or in a parking lot, garage or driveway. Home chargers can be equipped with delayed charging functions, so when people do plug in at home, their chargers can spread out the demand for electricity overnight. As Trancik and her team found in their research, this delayed charging will not stop people from getting all the charge they need for the next day’s travel. 

Once charging infrastructure is set up in the right places, financial incentives, like making electricity cheaper at low-demand times, could further nudge people to plug in when electricity is plentiful.

None of this will happen on its own, however. If we do not put chargers in strategic places, many people without off-street parking at home will have limited options for adopting and charging an EV. Meanwhile, those who do have off-street parking will charge their EVs right when they pull into their driveways at the end of the workday. Without further planning, if every person who now owns a gas car switched to an electric model, peak power demand in the U.S. could rise by 20% or more.5,6

That really would require many new power plants—and avoiding that Wild West scenario is easier said than done. 

“Getting everything to align can be, of course, challenging in the real world,” says Trancik. “To actually implement this, you need to find ways to incentivize the installation of chargers at the workplace, and also to provide these programs and incentives for that staggered home charging. And that's sometimes not the easiest thing to do on the ground, in part because you have a lot of different decision makers involved.”

Most American drivers are also accustomed to parking in a garage at home or on the street, refilling their gas tanks in a few minutes whenever they run low, and rarely if ever worrying about whether their car will have enough fuel. If we install enough chargers in convenient places, drivers will likely find that EVs are an easy switch, because apart from rare exceptions when making long-distance trips, their cars can be charged where they are already parked anyway. But if we fail to install these chargers, a switch to EVs will require some significant behavioral changes—a major barrier to adoption. And if we want to amplify the climate benefits of switching to EVs, we will also need to continue retiring climate-warming gas and coal plants and building more clean energy, like solar and wind paired with batteries. (It would also be beneficial to boost public transportation, walking and biking options, says Trancik, which have far less climate impact even than EVs when people find they are convenient for daily travel.)

If we do this right, a transition to EVs could do a great deal to slow climate change, without badly straining the grid. Today, there are over 250 million light-duty vehicles in the U.S.,7 emitting over one billion tons of climate-warming CO2 each year: more than 15% of the United States’ total climate pollution.8 EVs can dramatically cut this major source of climate warming. Depending on the model and driving conditions, a midsize EV’s contribution to climate change is about 30-60% lower than a comparable gas car.9

“There's a difference between saying, this is a future that we could work toward, versus this is what will happen,” says Trancik. “What will happen is up to all of us, and will depend on the decisions that we make.”

 

Thank you to David Maffucci of Charlotte, North Carolina, for the question.

Submit your own question to Ask MIT Climate

Get the latest from Ask MIT Climate monthly in your inbox

Read more Ask MIT Climate

 

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Footnotes

1 These figures are taken from the International Energy Agency's "Stated Policies Scenario," which analyzes climate policies already put in place around the world, and "Announced Pledges Scenario," which assumes governments will meet the climate goals they have pledged themselves to. See, International Energy Association: "Global EV Outlook 2024: Outlook for battery and energy demand." 2024.

2 Yip, Arthur, et al., "Highly Resolved Projections of Passenger Electric Vehicle Charging Loads for the Contiguous United States." National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2023.

3 International Energy Association: "Global EV Outlook 2024: Outlook for battery and energy demand." 2024.

4 U.S. Energy Information Administration: "Use of electricity." Updated December 18, 2023.

5 Needell, Zachary et. al., "Strategies for beneficial electric vehicle charging to reduce peak electricity demand and store solar energy." Cell Reports Physical Science, Volume 4, March 2023, doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101287.

6 Muratori, Matteo, "Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand." Nature Energy, January 2018, doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0074-z.

7 Bereau of Transportation Statistics, "Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances."

8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality: "U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1990-2022." May 2024.

9 Miotti, Marco, et al., "Personal vehicles evaluated against climate change mitigation targets." Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 20, 2016, doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00177. Data updated, made accessible and interactive at carboncounter.com, MIT Trancik Lab.

Want to Learn More?

Listen to this episode of MIT's "Today I Learned: Climate" podcast on electric vehicles.

Transcriptions

Laur Hesse Fisher: Hi, and welcome to Today I Learned: Climate. I’m your host Laur Hesse Fisher from the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative.

Electric vehicles, or EVs, are seeing an incredible surge around the world right now: in 2010, there were less than 20,000 EVs on the road – ten years later, there’s over 10 million.

In the U.S., EVs are still only about 2% of new car sales, but it’s looking like that will change:  several U.S. states are requiring that all new cars be zero-emissions by 2035, and some of the world’s largest carmakers – including Volvo, Honda, and GM – plan to be all-electric by around that same year.

EVs are being touted as a major solution to climate change. But why is that? How do they work and what kinds of changes are needed as more electric cars hit the road? To dig into this, we brought in someone who studies transportation technology.

David Keith: Hi, my name's David Keith. I'm a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management in the system dynamics group, where I study the emergence of new technologies in the automotive industry.

LHF: Today, most cars on the road are powered by gasoline also called “petrol” – which is derived from the oil that we pump out of the ground. And when cars burn gasoline, it sends all kinds of pollutants into the air out the tailpipe: including the greenhouse gas, CO2.

DK: So on the order of 30% of U.S greenhouse gas emissions come from the transportation sector broadly, and about two thirds of that is from what we call light duty vehicles, which is cars and pickup trucks. So about 20% of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States come from what we think of as cars.

LHF: Let’s start by breaking down how electric vehicles are different from gas-powered cars.

DK: In the gasoline vehicles that most of us have today, we have an engine up the front and then we have a gas tank in the back. An electric car replaces all of that with an electric powertrain. So instead of a gas tank, we have a battery and instead of an internal combustion engine, we have an electric motor.

The main benefits of electric cars is that they don't produce the emissions that come from the combustion of gasoline, that contribute to climate change, and the other is particulate emissions, small particles that are leftover when we burn gasoline, that can be very harmful to human health and contributes to the smog that we see in some big cities like Los Angeles.

Electric vehicles don't have tailpipe emissions. They don't even have a tailpipe.

LHF: So if we all switched to electric vehicles then… no more greenhouse gases, no more pollution, right?… Well, unfortunately, it’s more complicated than that.

DK: An electric vehicle is only as green as the electricity that goes into it. Those emissions could be zero or nearly zero if that electricity is coming from renewables, such as solar and wind. But on the U.S. electricity grid today, we have a lot of gas and some coal and other things as well.

LHF: That means EVs can still cause greenhouse gas emissions, but instead of at the tailpipe, it’s at the power plant.

DK: The vision for electric vehicles into the future — and the opportunity — is that as the grid gets greener, those electric cars that are already on the road will continue to get greener because the fuel we're putting in them have lower and lower carbon footprint.

LHF: That makes me wonder, because our electric grid still relies on fossil fuels, does switching from gas cars to electric cars make a difference today?

DK: We want the grid to get greener. But, not having green electricity is not really a reason to not electrify our vehicles. An electric vehicle running on coal has the fuel economy equivalent in the order of about 50 to 60 miles per gallon. So the dirtiest electric vehicle looks something like our best gasoline vehicles that are available today and an electric vehicle that's running on a really clean electricity supply that New England or the Pacific Northwest, or these places, the fuel economy equivalent — the MPGE is what we call it — it's up into the hundreds, so 110, 120 miles per gallon. It's a substantial improvement on the vehicles that run on gasoline.

LHF: But ramping up EVs is not without bumps in the road. If we want to keep driving our cars and want to seriously slow down climate change, we might also need to think about how we use cars today.

DK: In our work at MIT, we talk a lot about the norms that exist around vehicle ownership. We have a hundred years of history that has imprinted in our brains what car ownership involves, how fast it drives, how you refuel it, how long it takes to refuel — all of these things.

What we've observed is that we don't buy a vehicle that meets the average needs we have on a day-to-day basis. We buy a car that can serve our 99th percentile needs, which is the long driving holiday that we're going to take or towing the boat or whatever it is.

The first wave of electric vehicles had about a hundred mile range driving range. And now we're up into the 300 mile range. And yet almost every driver on almost every day will not use that 300 miles of driving range that they have.

LHF: Why does this matter?

DK: Range is expensive, because the more range we want, the more batteries we need to put into the car.
There's been a profound reduction in the cost of these batteries over the last decade. Batteries are about one sixth the price they were. But we're still talking $10,000 to $15,000 just for the battery to go into the car.

LHF: Currently, making batteries – for cars, but also for things like our laptops and cell phones – well that carries other costs, too: environmental costs, like water issues that arise from mining lithium, which is one of the metals that batteries need. Societal costs, like the forced and child labor that still exist today in the cobalt mines of Democratic Republic of the Congo. We have an entire episode in season two that focuses on this, called “Cleaning up clean tech", if you want to learn more about it.

But fewer batteries is not the direction that the market is going in.

DK: What we're seeing, is consumers tell us they want electric vehicles that operate like their gasoline vehicles operate today, which is long-range and fast refueling.

And it really feels like we're reaching a place in the market where the technology is maturing and we're seeing many more affordable and, and long range EVs. The latest, greatest electric vehicles are able to recharge in 20 minutes.

LHF: It doesn’t only matter how long it takes to charge an EV, but also where to charge it. Chargers are popping up, sure at gas stations, but more so where people are already parking their cars for a long time -- at home,  but also in lampposts and parking meters on city streets, in parking garages, and shopping-mall parking lots.

What also matters is when we charge our cars.

DK: If a hundred percent of vehicles on the road today were electric, our electricity consumption would go up in total, and it would go up quite considerably, on the order of say about 20%.

The aggregate amount of energy we're using matters, but also the time of day that we're charging matters a lot as well. If we all charged our electric vehicles overnight, while we slept and when electricity demand is relatively low, then supplying all that additional electricity probably wouldn't have a huge impact on the electricity grid. But if we all want to charge at, you know, 5:00 PM on a Friday afternoon in the middle of summer, when the peak load on the grid is already very high, then adding that additional load, could be really impactful and costly.

LHF: By the way, to understand this better, we have an entire episode in season two talking about how the electric grid works, and we recommend you check it out.

OK so, with all these innovations and demand increasing, EV sales around the world have doubled between 2020 and 2021. But because of how the car market works, it still might be a while before most cars on the road are electric.

DK: A new car sold today will be on the road for the next 15 to 20 years. But it's actually only about 20 to 30% of the population who buy new cars.  The market for used cars is about twice as big as the market for new cars. And this market hasn't existed for long enough that those cars have filtered down such that there's, you know, a really robust market for used electric vehicles.

LHF: One way to build up the market for EVs is to make them cheaper to buy.

DK: Many governments and others have incentivized the purchase of electric vehicles. But as I just said, the people who are buying those new EVs and who are often the ones eligible for those incentives are moderate to higher income households frequently. There are still a bunch of questions around equity of access.

LHF: Another way to get more people buying EVs is to tout how cool they are.

Ford F-150 Ad Narrator: It's got a targeted 775 pound feet of torque. It's targeted to go from zero to 60 in the mid-four second range. It's a driving experience that's pure, unfiltered exhilaration from the moment you hit the accelerator. Oh, and it's an F-150. Introducing the all electric F-150 Lightning, the smartest, most innovative F-150 we've ever built.

LHF: The F-150 pickup is the best selling vehicle in America. And Ford is betting its new electric version can appeal to an entirely new audience.

There are still challenges to work out – companies and researchers are working to make batteries less toxic to produce, as well as more easily recyclable or repurposing them for things like storing electricity from wind and solar. We have some great resources in our show notes on all these topics that we recommend you check out.

As these things get worked out, we’re going to be seeing many more electric cars on the road in the coming years – and there’s good reason for that.

DK: There is an environmental need in the automotive space to introduce zero emission vehicles, given that 20% of emissions that come from cars. And electric vehicles appear to be the most compelling solution to do that for passenger cars and light trucks.

I mean, I view EVs as one part of the solution, but certainly not sufficient as we think about sort of sustainable mobility more broadly. A limitation of purely going down the EV path is that we're not addressing some of those broader questions about traffic congestion or road safety. And there are many people in society who can't own can't afford to own a car at all. That's probably a conversation for another day.

LHF: That is a conversation we’re having another day: in fact, it’s our next episode coming out soon.

Please rate and subscribe to TILclimate on Spotify, Apple, Google or wherever you get your podcasts. As always, we have an accompanying Educator Guide to help teach about electric cars in the middle and high school classroom – check it out at climate.mit.edu/educators.

We’d love to hear from you—what climate topics should we cover? What questions can we answer? Email us at tilclimate@mit.edu. On Twitter we’re @tilclimate.

Thanks to David Keith of the MIT Sloan School of Management and thank you for listening.