Have a question?

Can we use the pipelines and power plants we have now to transport and burn hydrogen, or do we need new infrastructure?

Most legacy pipelines and power plants built for natural gas would need to be retrofitted or replaced to use hydrogen—except as a small percentage of a blend with natural gas.

 

March 29, 2023

Today, hydrogen is used in a number of industrial processes, particularly for refining oil and producing ammonia for fertilizer. But as the world economy transitions to running on clean energy, companies and policymakers hope to use more “green” or “renewable” hydrogen—produced with clean electricity and water instead of climate-warming methane gas—both to replace existing hydrogen sources, and to power other climate-polluting industries like steel and cement.

But scaling up hydrogen use will require dramatically growing the 1,600 miles of pipelines in the U.S. that currently transport it. Many companies have looked to the 3 million miles of natural gas pipelines as a potential transportation network, but the chemical properties of hydrogen will make that a challenge. “The bottom line: it is not as straightforward as just pushing through hydrogen in existing infrastructure,” says Emre Gençer, a principal research scientist at the MIT Energy Initiative. “Either it should be retrofitted or we need new infrastructure.”  

Here’s why.

The pipelines that transport hydrogen are made of the same basic material as most of those built for natural gas: steel. But hydrogen is a much smaller molecule than methane, the main component in natural gas. In fact, hydrogen is the smallest molecule on Earth. Its size means it can squeeze into tiny spaces in certain steel alloys in a way that natural gas cannot. That can cause “embrittlement,” making the metal more likely to crack or corrode. Hydrogen molecules are also much more likely to leak from valves, seals, and other connection points on pipelines (which risks undermining green hydrogen’s climate benefits1). And hydrogen is transported in a more pressurized state than natural gas, which puts more stress on the pipeline carrying it. 

Rather than transporting 100 percent hydrogen, many companies are now testing whether they can blend hydrogen with natural gas for transport in existing pipelines. In a study released last summer, the California Public Utility Commission found that up to 5 percent hydrogen blended with natural gas appears safe, but higher percentages could lead to embrittlement or a greater chance of pipeline leaks.2 Internationally, France places the highest cap on hydrogen blending, at 6 percent, according to the International Energy Agency (Germany allows blending at 8 percent under certain conditions).3

Supporters of blending say it can reduce the climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions from burning natural gas. But mixing hydrogen with natural gas, even if the hydrogen is produced from entirely clean electricity, lowers gas emissions by only a very small amount, says Gençer. Hydrogen also has a lower “energy density,” so we need to burn more of it to get the same amount of energy we get from burning methane.

As for using hydrogen to make energy in power plants, today’s plants appear able to run on hydrogen blends between 20 to 40 percent, says Gençer. At higher levels, a facility would need to undergo major upgrades or in some cases be completely updated. Current household appliances that use natural gas, like stoves, can tolerate blending at much lower levels. Gençer says it makes the most sense to focus early uses of green hydrogen in industries that already rely on hydrogen, rather than creating entirely new uses.

“The lower hanging fruit right now is really replacing the existing industrial demand for hydrogen from fossil-based to cleaner options,” he says.

 

Thank you to Scott MacKenzie of Pocatello, Idaho, for the question. You can submit your own question to Ask MIT Climate here.

Read more Ask MIT Climate

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Footnotes

1 Reuters: "Has green hydrogen sprung a leak?" Sarah Mcfarlane and Ron Bousso, December 22, 2022.

2 California Public Utilities Commission: "Hydrogen Blending Impacts Study," 2022.

3 International Energy Agency: "Current limits on hydrogen blending in natural gas networks and gas demand per capita in selected locations." Accessed March 15, 2023.

Want to learn more?

Listen to this episode of MIT's "Today I Learned: Climate" podcast on hydrogen energy.

Transcriptions

[00:00] LHF: Hello, and welcome to Today I Learned: Climate. I’m your host, Laur Hesse Fisher of the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative.

In Season Two of the show, we covered all kinds of energy sources — ones that we already use, like fossil fuels and wind and solar power, and ones that we might use someday in the future, like fusion.

In this episode today, we’re going to talk about another option that maybe you haven’t heard about yet… or might be
just starting to hear about — hydrogen.

[00:36] SI: Hydrogen is very versatile. Hydrogen can be used in electricity generation. Hydrogen can be used for
heating, for transportation. There is a lot of testing on how hydrogen can be used even in airplanes. And the burning of hydrogen will not produce that nasty carbon that we don't like.

I’m Svetlana Ikonnikova, from the Technical University of Munich for the School of Management Center for Energy
Markets. But I'm also a researcher at the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin. I analyze different energy resources, how we use them and how we want to use them in the future.

[01:18] LHF: Hydrogen is emerging as potentially a really important way for us to reduce carbon emissions. But what is it, and how can we use it? Why haven’t we heard more about it? That’s what we’ll cover in today’s episode.

[01:33] SI: Hydrogen has atomic number one. So we all probably know it with the periodic table. So this is a colorless, tasteless and odorless non-metallic gas.

Hydrogen is also highly flammable, and so we can burn it. If we can burn it, we can make energy.

But pure hydrogen does not occur a lot on our planet earth. And so to be able to get that gas, we need to split substances into simple parts to extract the hydrogen.

[02:06] LHF: Yeah. First we have to actually make hydrogen gas before we can use it. This is unlike our current energy
sources, right, like coal, natural gas, oil, uranium, sunlight, wind, water, which we can find on our planet.

It seems strange to think of doing that – why would we take the extra step of producing hydrogen gas in order to use it? But we already do this all the time… with electricity.

[02:34] SI: Electricity can help us to drive cars, to use our laptops, but in order to get electricity, we have to do some work. We have to burn gas or coal, or have hydroelectric generation.

[02:49] LHF: This is why hydrogen and electricity are called energy carriers, and not energy sources. Electricity has so many benefits that it’s worth generating – the same is potentially true with hydrogen.

We’ll get back to how we produce hydrogen in a minute, but first, let’s talk about how we can use it.

[03:12] SI: Hydrogen is so versatile that we can really try to substitute it across all the main sectors we usually talk
about as we talk about CO2 or any other greenhouse gas emissions. We can use it in transportation, and currently there have been tests for using hydrogen in shipping, in airplanes, in road vehicles, trucks specifically. Hydrogen can be used in electricity generation. Hydrogen can be used for heating. It can go directly to your boiler to heat up your water.

We can also mix it with natural gas itself and just reduce the concentration of carbon.

[03:55] LHF: Yeah, so you can blend hydrogen with the gas that many people burn in their home hot water heaters or furnaces, to create a lower-carbon version. This is kind of like how currently ethanol is blended with gasoline and used in car gas tanks today. We could also burn hydrogen instead of fossil fuels for industrial processes like making steel, where
you need a lot of consistent and reliable heat, which can be difficult to get entirely from clean energy.

[04:25] SI: It has definitely been already proven that we can use hydrogen to reduce the use of natural gas and
coal in steel manufacturing, in order to make the process cleaner.

[04:38] LHF: This is what makes hydrogen gas so appealing: It can do most of the things that currently only fossil
fuels can do—BUT, unlike fossil fuels, it doesn’t release CO2 when burned.

And there’s another potentially important use of hydrogen.

[04:54] SI: Hydrogen, just like some other energy resources, could be stored for a long time. We like renewable resources, but at the moment we do not have a good solution to store the electricity.

[05:09] LHF: Yeah, hydrogen could actually complement wind and solar by storing electricity that can be used when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun isn’t shining.

OK. so now let’s talk about how we actually produce energy from hydrogen gas. Generally, you can either burn it for
heat or power, like we do now with natural gas, or use it to generate electricity using something called a fuel cell.

[05:38] SI: Fuel cells actually have been known to humankind for close to 200 years. In the beginning of the 19th century, Sir William Grove figured out that if you apply electricity to water, you can split the water molecule into oxygen and hydrogen. And he got an idea that you could apply a reverse reaction in order to bring the two things back.

So just as you use electricity to split the oxygen and hydrogen, if you bring hydrogen and oxygen together, you can
get electricity and water, steam.

The hydrogen we usually get from some hydrogen tank. And then we have oxygen that we typically would get from air.

[06:29] LHF: So hydrogen gas goes in one end of the fuel cell, that produces electricity, heat, and water vapor. Compare this to gas-powered car, where gasoline goes into the engine, but in addition to power, you also get CO2 and other pollution. In fact, there are hydrogen-powered cars, and we have some links in our show notes if you want to learn more about them.

But fuel cells have other applications, too..

[06:59] SI: These days, fuel cells are used in big power generation plants, like for instance, in South Korea, recently
they had installed the hydrogen plant that can power about 250,000 homes. So like a small city. So it's about 80 megawatt plant.

And now we’ve developed a fuel cells that could be so small that you can use in your laptop, or even try to use it in your cell phone.

[07:27] LHF: Hydrogen sounds pretty great, right? And hydrogen production isn’t just happening in a lab right now. Industries already extract it and use it for things like fertilizers and oil refining.

But if we want to scale up the use of hydrogen for clean energy, it’s important to consider how we get that hydrogen.

[07:50] SI: Hydrogen occurs naturally very rarely, but more frequently we can have hydrogen in different combinations with hydrocarbons, oxygen, many other chemical compounds.

[08:03] LHF: Remember that everything is made out of molecules, and those molecules are made out of atoms. Hydrogen gas is two atoms of hydrogen – H2. To get this molecule, we need to pull it out from other molecules.

[08:22] SI: We take some molecule where hydrogen is. The very simple one that we may think about is methane or natural gas. The formula for this is CH4. So we have one atom of carbon and it holds four hydrogen. We can split the two, and then put the carbon away in some shape, and then we have hydrogen.

Currently about 95% of hydrogen is produced from methane, which means that we have as a residual, carbon dioxide. So that carbon goes back into the atmosphere. It's polluting. This hydrogen we don’t like. This hydrogen will not be a solution. We'll see the solution in the hydrogen only if it helps us to capture the carbon, if we use the fossil fuels,
and then utilize it or store it or sequester it, do something with that.

[09:18] LHF: Right, we have an episode on carbon capture and storage if you want to learn more about this.

But, there is a way to produce hydrogen without producing carbon.

[09:30] SI: If we use renewable energy, we can produce much cleaner hydrogen. There is no carbon residual. In really simple terms, if you take water and you put a current through it, you will start breaking the chemical linkages between the hydrogen and oxygen as chemical elements.

[09:54] LHF: This is kinda like a reverse fuel cell. Water and electricity go in, hydrogen and oxygen come out.

One of the things that makes hydrogen so appealing is that, like electricity, it could potentially be produced anywhere.

[10:11] SI: If you have nearby fossil fuels, you can produce from fossil fuels. If you are somewhere where you have wind
or solar, you can use wind and solar and water and produce hydrogen once again. And if it can’t be produced somewhere – for example, if you don’t have a lot of freshwater – you can move it around. You can transport hydrogen in some cases almost as efficient as natural gas.

[10:38] LHF: So often something that we hear when we’re speaking with scientists about climate change is that there's no silver bullet. There's no one technology that's going to come and save us. And that's what we should invest all of our money in.

But is hydrogen this silver bullet, given how versatile it is?

[10:57] SI: As much as I like hydrogen, I would agree with all those scientists who say that there will not be a unique solution for us. And hydrogen is most likely — we believe would be a big portion of the solution for the future, but not it's sole, and potentially not even a primary part of it.

[11:16] LHF: And that’s for many reasons. Hydrogen is currently more expensive than other low-carbon energy options, like wind and solar. Scaling up the development of pipelines and other infrastructure is also a challenge. In some conditions, hydrogen produces nitrogen oxides when it’s burned, which is a different kind of greenhouse gas.

And hydrogen is also extremely flammable, and ignites more easily than methane gas or gasoline.

Overcoming these challenges would mean convincing a lot more people to spend time, money and effort on hydrogen.

[11:54] SI: There are many different projections coming from the leading energy agencies around the world. Almost all of those agencies show a really wide uncertainty gap around what may happen.

And the issue is not just in how much would it take to influence the production of hydrogen. It will depend on how fast we can grow production of the renewable energy. Because we don't want to expand to a large degree use of fossil fuels just to convert them to hydrogen.

We’re still in the early stages in exploring its possibilities And so we shouldn't look into current hydrogen development as a signal to whether it has a bright future or not, but rather get some patience and take another decade until we see how it will unfold.

[12:57] LHF: That’s our episode for today. If you haven’t listened to our season 2, I highly recommend that you do – it is all about energy and climate change, explained in a way that we can all understand.

As always, we have an accompanying educator guide to help teach about hydrogen in middle school and high school classrooms. You can find it at climate.mit.edu/educators, or for free on the popular site, Teachers Pay Teachers.

TILclimate is produced by the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. David Lishansky is the Editor and Producer. Aaron Krol is our Associate Producer — and did our artwork. Ilana Hirschfeld was our Production Assistant, Natalie Jones was our Scriptwriter for this episode. Michelle Harris did the fact-checking. Sylvia Scharf is our Climate Education Specialist. The music is by Blue Dot Sessions. And I’m your Host and Producer, Laur Hesse Fisher.

A big thanks to Prof. Svetlana Ikonnikova for speaking with us, and thank you for listening.