New to Climate Change?

Aviation

Aviation emissions are responsible for around 5% of climate warming, and this share is rising. In 2015, aircraft burned 240 million metric tons of fuel, releasing about 756 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO₂). While the fuel economy of aviation is improving at around 1-2% per year, this is being outstripped by growth in travel demand of 4-5% per year. The overall forecast is for aviation emissions to at least double by 2050, in a time frame when the world needs to stop the rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere altogether.

A Unique Problem

Aviation is also a unique industry: it is the only major source of emissions high in the atmosphere. These emissions have a very different effect than similar emissions at ground level. When fuel is burned, it results not only in CO₂ but also water vapor. This vapor can condense and freeze in the cold higher atmosphere to form artificial, line-shaped clouds behind aircraft called condensation trails, or “contrails.”

These contrails reflect sunlight, which has a cooling effect on the planet, but also trap outgoing heat, causing a warming effect. Since these clouds trap more heat than they reflect, the contrails from planes have a warming effect on the Earth—about as strong as from their CO₂ emissions. Night flights cause the most warming since there is no sunlight at night to reflect back into space, so contrails only trap heat.

The Future of Aviation

Reducing emissions from aviation is a major challenge, in part because the industry is already working hard to minimize the amount of fuel it burns. New airplane and propulsion technologies can help, but because airplane development is long and complex, and planes usually last 25 to 30 years once produced, it takes time for innovations to be introduced. Improvements in operating airplanes (for example, more efficient flight paths) can reduce fuel burn, but these efficiencies can only go so far.

Flying routes that make fewer contrails could reduce climate impacts. Using biofuels instead of fossil-based jet fuel could help planes add less CO₂ to the atmosphere, but these fuels are expensive. Engineers are also exploring radically different ways of powering airplanes, such as batteries or hydrogen fuel, which are topics of active research at MIT and elsewhere. But even if new planes are designed that emit no greenhouse gases, it could take decades for enough of them to be built and put into use to make a significant difference. All this means that, in the short term, aviation will be one of the hardest sources of greenhouse gases to control.

Infographic: Electric planes. One way to fly without emitting greenhouse gases is to convert our airplanes to run on electricity—just like with electric cars. But airplanes need much more power to fly than cars need to drive, and batteries add much more weight to a plane than jet fuel. That means it’s extraordinarily hard for electric batteries to match the performance of today’s large passenger jets. Information in the chart below comes from news reports in BBC Future (“The Largest Electric Plane Ever to Fly,” June 17, 2020) and NBC News (“The largest electric plane yet completed its first flight—but it’s the batteries that matter,” June 2, 2020).

Click here to see data from the infographic above in a table.

Type of airplane	Model and description	Length	Wingspan	Passenger capacity	Range
Electric	The largest electric plane ever to fly was a converted Cessna Caravan 208B, which successfully took flight in May 2020.	41 feet	52 feet	9 passengers	100 miles
Conventional	Commercial air travel is dominated by the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 series. In the U.S., the most common plane in the skies is the Boeing 737-800.	130 feet	113 feet	189 passengers	3,600 miles