Have a question?

I’ve heard the Carbon-14 in the atmosphere proves that fossil fuels are the cause of climate change. How?

The mix of different types of carbon in an object gives clues to its history. The carbon from fossil fuels has a unique “fingerprint”—free of Carbon-14—that we can see changing the makeup of the atmosphere. 

 

October 17, 2024 

Today, we know the atmosphere has much more carbon dioxide (CO2) than it did in the recent past, and that the buildup of this heat-trapping gas is the main driver of climate change. We know this because we can directly sample the air and measure the amount of CO2 in it—and even find samples of much older air for comparison, frozen in Antarctic ice

It stands to reason that this CO2 comes from burning the fossil fuels coal, oil and gas. These fuels are composed mostly of carbon. That carbon is released into the air when they’re burned, and humanity has been burning massive amounts of fossil fuels over the same period the planet has been warming. But can we prove it? In fact, the carbon in our atmosphere shows telltale signs of originating from fossil fuels, thanks to one atom: “Carbon-14.”

Carbon comes in several forms, or “isotopes.” The most common by far is Carbon-12, which has six neutrons and is “stable,” meaning it doesn't degrade over time. Carbon-14, the rarest of carbon isotopes, has two extra neutrons, which make it unstable and radioactive. It takes roughly 5,700 years to break down, after which it turns into nitrogen.

That’s a short time in the history of the world, and if we weren’t getting extra Carbon-14 from somewhere, it would all long since have disappeared. But we do get new Carbon-14: tiny amounts of it are constantly made from nitrogen in our atmosphere, interacting with cosmic rays.

“Normally, you have an approximate steady state between the rate at which the cosmic rays form Carbon-14 and the rate at which it decays on Earth,” says Ed Boyle, a professor of ocean geochemistry at MIT who studies the evolution of Earth’s climate. In other words, unless something else is changing our atmosphere, the amount of Carbon-14 in the air should stay roughly the same.

These facts make Carbon-14 a useful “tracer” molecule, which researchers can use to learn the age of objects containing carbon, which includes almost every object on Earth. Consider a tree used to build an ancient house. When the tree was living, it took in Carbon-14 from the air—but after it was cut down, it stopped bringing in new Carbon-14. From that point on, the Carbon-14 in the wood breaks down at a predictable rate, half of it disappearing every 5,700 years. By measuring the ratio of Carbon-14 to Carbon-12 in the wood, an archaeologist can learn how old the house is. This tool is called radiocarbon dating, and in addition to wooden artifacts, it also helps scientists date bones, fossils and rocks.

In radiocarbon dating, you can think of Carbon-14 as a sort of gradually fading dye, added to a pool of clear water. The older the water, the less color it contains.

What if we tried to measure the atmosphere this way? You wouldn’t expect this to tell us much: unlike a dead tree, the atmosphere is constantly getting new Carbon-14. But over the last four decades, the ratio of Carbon-14 in the atmosphere has been falling anyway:1 our atmospheric “pool” keeps getting clearer. 

Since the atmosphere wouldn’t lose Carbon-14 simply with age, the pool must be clearing up another way: somehow, the air is gaining Carbon-12. In fact, the amount of carbon in the atmosphere is currently rising by over 4.5 billion tons a year,2 with very little Carbon-14 in the mix.

And this is a huge clue to where the carbon is coming from. If it came from plants, or ocean circulation, or soils, we would expect it to contain some Carbon-14, since these sources all interact regularly with the atmosphere and can incorporate new carbon molecules. But carbon from fossil fuels looks quite different. Fossil fuels have spent millions of years buried deep underground, and any Carbon-14 they did contain decayed away a long time ago. Burning them today releases mostly “clear” Carbon-12, and no “dyed” Carbon-14 at all.3 

“It's basically just pouring more water into the pool, but the new water doesn't have Carbon-14 in it,” says Boyle. “Now, if you were to stop burning fossil fuels entirely, the balance would get restored eventually, but it would take centuries for that to happen.” 

(There is one wrinkle in the consistent downward trend in Carbon-14: nuclear weapons testing in the mid-20th Century released a huge amount of radioactive Carbon-14. The story we’ve told above controls for that sudden burst of Carbon-14, and its gradual fading away in the decades since.)

Carbon-14 has more to teach us about climate change, says Boyle. Because Carbon-14 can act as a tracer, ratios of carbon in the air and the ocean can help us understand the natural carbon cycle and how quickly carbon moves through it. Carbon moves at different speeds through different parts of the deep and surface oceans, and past, natural episodes of climate change have been hugely influenced by changes in ocean currents that caused more or less carbon to travel between sea and air. “Exchanges between those two are an important part of the climate system,” Boyle says. “We can use Carbon-14 to help estimate the rates at which these processes were happening in the past.”

 

Thank you to Peter Penoyer of Fort Collins, Colorado for the question.

Submit your own question to Ask MIT Climate

Get the latest from Ask MIT Climate monthly in your inbox

Read more Ask MIT Climate

 

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Footnotes

1 Graven, Heather, Ralph F. Keeling and Joeri Rogelj, "Changes to Carbon Isotopes in Atmospheric CO2 Over the Industrial Era and Into the Future." Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Volume 34, Issue 11, 2020, doi:10.1029/2019GB006170.

2 Friedlingstein, Pierre et. al., "Global Carbon Budget 2023." Earth System Science Data, Volume 15, Issue 12, 2023, doi:10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023

3 The story is a bit more complicated than this: fossil fuels also contain less of the isotope Carbon-13 than the atmosphere does, a sign that this carbon comes from plants and algae. (Which, indeed, are the raw ingredients of coal, oil and gas.) Together, the ratio of the three carbon isotopes make up a sample’s unique “isotopic fingerprint,” and the carbon entering the atmosphere today bears the telltale print of fossil fuels. 

Want to Learn More?

Listen to this episode of MIT's "Today I Learned: Climate" podcast on the natural carbon cycle.

Transcriptions

LHF: Hello, I’m Laur Hesse Fisher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you’re listening to Today I Learned: Climate.

So get this: some of the climate-warming carbon dioxide that we create when we burn fossil fuels is naturally absorbed by the Earth. In other words, every day, plants, trees, soils, even the oceans are taking some of our climate pollution out of the atmosphere.

But how much? Well, today we’re answering that question from Howland L. of Washington, who wonders: how much carbon dioxide does the Earth naturally absorb?

So let’s begin by quickly covering how the Earth absorbs carbon from the atmosphere.

Okay, so you probably have heard of photosynthesis, where plants and algae take CO2 out of the air and pick it apart for its carbon, which they use to grow. That’s one way the Earth absorbs carbon. Another way is through the oceans: CO2 also mixes with and dissolves into ocean water.

But that carbon doesn’t stay out of the air forever. Here to explain is Prof. Daniel Rothman, who studies the Earth’s carbon cycle at the MIT Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences.

DR: I like to think of the carbon cycle as a loop between photosynthesis, which takes CO2 out of the atmosphere and oceans, and respiration, which describes all the metabolic processes that organisms, ranging from microbes to mammals, use when organic carbon is oxidized and reconverted to CO2.

LHF: Yeah, it’s reconverted to CO2 when the plants and the animals and humans that eat them die and decompose and their carbon binds with oxygen and becomes CO2 again, or when those animals breathe out, right, like we breathe out CO2.

This is the carbon cycle. It’s a lot like the water cycle, which you probably already know about. Water falls as rain, and then evaporates and rises back up into clouds.

You know how some parts of the water cycle happen daily – like rainfall and evaporation – and some parts of it take hundreds, thousands, millions of years – like forming glaciers and ice sheets? Well, that’s kinda similar with carbon, too. 

DR: An important thing to realize is that, once CO2 is converted to organic carbon by a plant, its reconversion to CO2 occurs at a vast range of time scales, ranging from minutes to millions of years.

LHF: Here’s an example: when plants and algae and animals die and then get buried deeply enough over millions of years, they become subject to incredible pressures and temperatures. And eventually, this pressurized organic matter becomes carbon-rich coal, oil, and gas, trapped in rocks underground.

DR: In fact, about one-tenth of a percent of carbon enters the rock cycle. Some is simply locked up in rocks until either it’s brought back to the surface, by us, and becomes fossil fuel, or it reenters the atmosphere via volcanism, or is uplifted on the continents by plate tectonics.

LHF: But for carbon to be pulled out of the atmosphere, and buried, and pressurized into fossil fuels, and then naturally reenter the atmosphere in this way, it takes hundreds of millions of years. In fact, some coal deposits have been locked up underground for more than 300 million years.

So these are the different speeds of the carbon cycle. And, despite all these different speeds, the natural carbon cycle has more or less been in balance.

DR: Roughly speaking, the natural cycle takes up and puts out about 100 gigatons of carbon every year into the atmosphere. A gigaton is one billion tons.

LHF: One hundred billion tons of carbon!

All right, so I’m going to subject you to some math and chemistry just for a quick moment, because when that carbon binds with oxygen in the air, it becomes carbon dioxide, right, CO2. So if you want to know the amount of CO2 flowing through the carbon cycle, or flowing in and out of the atmosphere, you have to weigh the oxygen atoms along with those carbon atoms. And that would make it 350 billion tons of carbon dioxide.

You’re probably like me, in that you find it really hard to even begin to visualize a number like 350 billion tons. But here’s a stab at it: so the weight of all the buildings in New York City is around 750 million tons. (Yeah, someone estimated it.) So the carbon dioxide that the Earth absorbs and releases every year to and from the atmosphere weighs about 500 New York Cities. Every year!

So that is your answer, Howland. It’s a lot!

But how about the carbon that humans are adding when we dig up and burn those fossil fuels? I mean, it’s enough to influence our whole climate system. So it must be a lot of CO2, right? 

DR: Human-based emissions are about an order of magnitude less, or about ten percent of the natural flux.

LHF: Wait, so all this extra CO2 that we’re so worried about—that we’ve been told again and again are dangerous for us and our planet—they’re only a tenth of what the Earth naturally absorbs every year?

DR: The average person might think that 10% additional CO2 emissions is a minor perturbation of the natural cycle. But it accrues over time.

LHF: Yeah, the natural cycle can’t absorb CO2 quickly enough to remove all of this extra carbon. Think about a bathtub where the water coming out of the spout is faster than what’s going down the drain. The water starts building up in the bathtub, right? Same as with carbon. In fact, about 40% of our emissions just stick around in the atmosphere, building up year after year.

DR: What we’re doing with taking coal and oil and gas out of the ground is essentially speeding up a natural process. Geologic processes such as plate tectonics would naturally bring that carbon back up, but on a much slower time scale, over millions of years. Now we’re releasing all that carbon over a few hundred years.

LHF: In fact, since humans have started burning fossil fuels at a large scale, we’ve managed to add about 300 billion tons of carbon to the atmosphere total. That is roughly triple the size of the natural carbon cycle.

DR: Eventually that extra CO2 would be naturally diminished by processes involving the rock cycle. But it would take on the order of 100,000 years.

LHF: So once we’ve opened up a shortcut in the natural cycle, there’s no natural shortcut back. If we don’t pull the extra CO2 out of the atmosphere, we’ll have to live with it, and the warming that it brings—perhaps for thousands of generations.

And that makes this a uniquely important time in our planet’s history. Because we can still stop shortcutting the carbon cycle. By keeping fossil fuels in the ground, that carbon will be locked up in the slowest parts of the carbon cycle. And there are other ways to keep carbon in that slow cycle: by pumping our carbon emissions in the ground, or by locking carbon up in rocks or the deep ocean. To learn more about those methods to work with this slow path of the carbon cycle, check out our show notes on tilclimate.mit.edu.

So thank you again for this question, Howland. I hope you learned as much from this episode as we did. And for all of our other listeners, if you have a question you want to ask us—please do! Visit climate.mit.edu/ask or leave us a voicemail message at 617 253 3566. We’ll be releasing answers as episodes here on TILclimate as well as at climate.mit.edu.

We always love hearing from our listeners! Feel free to leave us a voicemail message at the number we just mentioned, or email us at climate@mit.edu. We’d love to know about who you are, what you’re working on, and why you listen to the show.

TILclimate is the climate change podcast of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aaron Krol is our Writer and Producer. David Lishansky is our Audio Producer. Michelle Harris is our fact-checker. Sylvia Scharf is our Climate Education Specialist. The music is by Blue Dot Sessions. And I’m your Host and Executive Producer, Laur Hesse Fisher. 

A big thanks to Prof. Daniel Rothman for speaking with us, to Andrew Moseman who did the original reporting for this episode, and to Howland L. – and all of you, our listeners – for your climate curiosity.