Skip to main content
Climate
Search

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
MIT

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
PostNovember 19, 2020

Massive, swift federal investment needed to address climate change, panelists say

The last of MIT’s six Climate Action Symposia, What is the World Waiting For? Policies to Fight Climate Change, was held virtually on Nov. 16, 2020. From left to right: L. Rafael Reif, Katherine Castor, John Podesta, Paul Joskow, Todd Stern, and John Deutch.

To stave off the worst immediate outcomes of climate change, the U.S. needs to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050, according to a report released this June by the U.S. House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

In the final event in MIT’s Climate Action Symposia series, held Nov. 16, a panel of policymakers agreed the 2050 deadline means that the time for small-scale climate solutions has passed. Swift and massive investment by the U.S. federal government is essential, they said, beginning with the incoming Biden administration.

Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida said previous climate legislation has stalled in the face of climate change deniers in Congress and the influence of entrenched interests such as fossil fuel companies. Castor is the chair of the House Select Committee on Climate Crisis. She called its report a roadmap for how the U.S. can decarbonize the power and transportation sectors of the economy, among other recommendations.

The Biden administration climate change plan, which includes many of the same elements as the House report, would cost $2 trillion, Castor noted, likening it to past massive federal efforts such as building the interstate highway system or mobilizing the country for World War II.

To reach the 2050 emissions goal, “it’s all hands on deck,” she said. “We don’t have any more time to waste to take small measures. We have to take the larger steps to make progress.”

Investments toward the 2050 goal also can help rebuild an economy that has been devastated by the Covid-19 pandemic, said John Podesta, chair and counselor at the Center for American Progress. The Biden plan and the House report emphasize new job and industry creation through zero-emission vehicle manufacture, new power transmission systems for clean energy, and new low-carbon construction.

“It’s a shift of thinking from where we were a decade ago,” said Podesta, who served as a counselor to the president on climate and environmental policy in the Obama administration. “It really calls for these major investments sustained by the federal government but deployed by the private sector and by state and local government.”

The Biden plan also includes a goal for 40 percent of all clean energy and infrastructure benefits contained in the plan to go disadvantaged communities, he noted, “to build back a more just and equitable economy.”

The past four years have weakened global trust in the U.S. when it comes addressing climate change, said Todd Stern, a nonresident senior fellow at The Brookings Institution.

“Countries are not going to look at us in just the same way, but I will say this: I think countries are going to be very eager to have the U.S. back,” said Stern, who led the U.S. effort in negotiating the Paris climate agreement. “Somewhat wary, for understandable reasons, but eager.”

Along with rejoining the Paris agreement, the U.S must make climate change a “core part” of its national security and diplomatic strategy, said Stern. As a start, the U.S. should renew its partnerships with the European Union’s climate leaders and attempt to repair a deteriorated relationship with China to prod it to speed up its own zero carbon goals.

In a lively discussion moderated by MIT’s John Deutch, Institute Professor Emeritus, and Paul Joskow, Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics Emeritus, the panelists argued over whether decarbonization by 2050 was more aspirational than realistic. Faced with the prospect of the collapse of water and food systems, climate refugees, and failed states, “I don’t ask myself it it’s realistic,” Podesta said. “I ask myself is it critical or necessary, and the answer to that is yes.”

MIT President L. Rafael Reif, speaking at the symposium’s start, said the pandemic has many thinking about similarly about the imminent climate challenge.

“This tragic, natural crisis has demonstrated that as individuals and as a society, we can actually change, more and faster than we have believed possible,” he said. “It has also made clear that refusing to change can be catastrophic, and that nature does not respond to wishful thinking.”

by MIT News
Topics
Government & Policy
International Agreements
Renewable Energy
Finance & Economics

Related Posts

PostJuly 4, 2025

Robotic probe quickly measures key properties of new materials

MIT News
Scientists are striving to discover new semiconductor materials that could boost the efficiency of solar cells and other electronics. The pace of innovation is bottlenecked by the speed at which researchers can manually measure important material properties, but a fully autonomous robotic system developed by MIT researchers could speed things up.
PostJune 16, 2025

Lack of middleman between Illinois farmers and consumers limits market for ...

MIT Climate
A man laughs while carrying a white and green box that reads "farm fresh vegetables."
PostJune 12, 2025

A Complete Picture of Sustainability

MIT Spectrum
Example of a modeling map.
PostJune 12, 2025

Podcast episode: Digging into climate-smart dairy with Carolyn Beans

MIT Climate
A composite of two side-by-side images. On the left, a woman with a blue shirt smiles. On the right is the logo of the FarmHouse podcast: a flowerpot and a window, through which we can see a small building and windmill.

MIT Climate News in Your Inbox

 
 

MIT Groups Log In

Log In

Footer

  • About
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
MIT Climate Project
MIT
Communicator Award Winner
Communicator Award Winner