Skip to main content
Climate
Search

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
MIT

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
PostNovember 2, 2017

Intersectional Challenges for Climate Justice

On the 26th of October, the New York Times ran an evocative piece called "The Uninhabitable Village" on farmer suicides and rising temperatures in Tamil Nadu. The Tamil country has a special significance for me since I am Tamil, being born about two hundred miles from Nagapattinam where this story was reported. While I was reading - viewing, really - this story, I was struck by the correlation between farmer suicides and warmer temperatures. That, in turn lead me to recent work by Tamma Carleton, with an eye popping statistic: 

UC Berkeley researcher Tamma Carleton discovered that warming a single day by 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) during India’s agricultural growing season leads to roughly 65 suicides across the country, whenever that day’s temperature is above 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit). Warming a day by 5 degrees Celsius has five times that effect.

That's 65 additional suicides per day. We are at the threshold of our second season on climate justice and it's these stories that I want to understand more deeply. Farmer suicides have been a problem in India for a long time and are directly tied to neoliberal economic policies and the move towards intensive, market driven agriculture. 

Anthropogenic warming is only going to make this worse - rising temperatures drives crop failures and will also make input costs more expensive (imagine the killing to be made by the Monsanto's of the world by marketing "heat-resistant" seeds) and of course, water will be the scarcest commodity of all. 

Incidentally, Tamil Nadu is one of the richest and most industrialized states in the Indian Union, which is why the men in the NYT story can migrate toward industrial employment. What happens to the women when the men migrate, temperatures rise and you're responsible for agricultural labor and sustanence?

Climate justice is intersectional by its very nature - it cannot be understood in isolation from food, water, gender, geography and imperial history and in my view, there's no solution without substantial reparations from the west. 

by Rajesh Kasturirangan
Topics
Cities & Planning
Food, Water & Agriculture
Climate Justice

Related Posts

PostJune 16, 2025

Lack of middleman between Illinois farmers and consumers limits market for ...

MIT Climate
A man laughs while carrying a white and green box that reads "farm fresh vegetables."
PostJune 13, 2025

A journey of resilience, fueled by learning

MIT Open Learning
Hilal Mohammadzai graduated from the MIT Emerging Talent Certificate in Computer and Data Science as part of his path to pursue a career in data science.
PostJune 13, 2025

After more than a decade of successes, ESI’s work will spread out across ...

MIT News
John Fernandez, professor in the Department of Architecture and director of MIT’s Environmental Solutions Initiative, has led ESI since 2015.
PostJune 12, 2025

A Complete Picture of Sustainability

MIT Spectrum
Example of a modeling map.

MIT Climate News in Your Inbox

 
 

MIT Groups Log In

Log In

Footer

  • About
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
MIT Climate Project
MIT
Communicator Award Winner
Communicator Award Winner