Skip to main content
Climate
Search

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
MIT

Main navigation

  • Climate 101
    • What We Know
    • What Can Be Done
    • Climate Primer
  • Explore
    • Explainers
    • Ask MIT Climate
    • Podcast
    • For Educators
  • MIT Action
    • News
    • Events
    • Resources
  • Search
PostNovember 2, 2017

Intersectional Challenges for Climate Justice

On the 26th of October, the New York Times ran an evocative piece called "The Uninhabitable Village" on farmer suicides and rising temperatures in Tamil Nadu. The Tamil country has a special significance for me since I am Tamil, being born about two hundred miles from Nagapattinam where this story was reported. While I was reading - viewing, really - this story, I was struck by the correlation between farmer suicides and warmer temperatures. That, in turn lead me to recent work by Tamma Carleton, with an eye popping statistic: 

UC Berkeley researcher Tamma Carleton discovered that warming a single day by 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) during India’s agricultural growing season leads to roughly 65 suicides across the country, whenever that day’s temperature is above 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit). Warming a day by 5 degrees Celsius has five times that effect.

That's 65 additional suicides per day. We are at the threshold of our second season on climate justice and it's these stories that I want to understand more deeply. Farmer suicides have been a problem in India for a long time and are directly tied to neoliberal economic policies and the move towards intensive, market driven agriculture. 

Anthropogenic warming is only going to make this worse - rising temperatures drives crop failures and will also make input costs more expensive (imagine the killing to be made by the Monsanto's of the world by marketing "heat-resistant" seeds) and of course, water will be the scarcest commodity of all. 

Incidentally, Tamil Nadu is one of the richest and most industrialized states in the Indian Union, which is why the men in the NYT story can migrate toward industrial employment. What happens to the women when the men migrate, temperatures rise and you're responsible for agricultural labor and sustanence?

Climate justice is intersectional by its very nature - it cannot be understood in isolation from food, water, gender, geography and imperial history and in my view, there's no solution without substantial reparations from the west. 

by Rajesh Kasturirangan
Topics
Cities & Planning
Food, Water & Agriculture
Climate Justice

Related Posts

PostJune 16, 2025

Lack of middleman between Illinois farmers and consumers limits market for ...

MIT Climate
A man laughs while carrying a white and green box that reads "farm fresh vegetables."
PostJune 12, 2025

A Complete Picture of Sustainability

MIT Spectrum
Example of a modeling map.
PostJune 12, 2025

Podcast episode: Digging into climate-smart dairy with Carolyn Beans

MIT Climate
A composite of two side-by-side images. On the left, a woman with a blue shirt smiles. On the right is the logo of the FarmHouse podcast: a flowerpot and a window, through which we can see a small building and windmill.
PostJune 11, 2025

A vision for transportation resilience in the energy transition

MIT Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy
Rethinking resilience of low-carbon transportation

MIT Climate News in Your Inbox

 
 

MIT Groups Log In

Log In

Footer

  • About
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
MIT Climate Project
MIT
Communicator Award Winner
Communicator Award Winner