Have a question?

How do we know what the Earth’s climate was like millions of years ago?

In seafloor sediments, stalagmites, ice sheets, and other natural records preserved from the ancient past, “paleoclimatologists” search for clues to past temperatures, atmospheres and weather patterns.

 

March 21, 2025

For 10,000 years leading up to the 20th century, our climate was remarkably stable. The Earth’s average temperature never changed by more than about 1° C, and only in slow, steady shifts over thousands of years.1,2,3 All human history as we would recognize it, with farms and cities and complex societies, falls in this era of stability.

But in the larger view, the Earth’s climate is anything but steady. “Earth's climate has always been changing,” says David McGee, professor of Earth and planetary sciences at MIT. “Even in the last 1% of Earth’s history, so the last 45 million years, we've seen changes in the Earth's mean temperature of roughly 30 to 40 degrees Fahrenheit [17 to 22° C].”

Of course, we don’t have 45 million years of thermometer records to tell us this. Instead, scientists search for clues about ancient climates in the oldest surviving features of the natural world: a field of science called “paleoclimate.”

“Paleoclimate is the art of the possible,” says McGee. “There are only so many things that are left over from thousands of years ago, and even fewer left over from millions of years ago. We have to rely upon natural archives, things that grow or are deposited and somehow record information about the climate around them as they form.”

A good example is the layers of sediment that build up on the ocean floor. “If you're able to drill or core down into them, you essentially have a time machine,” McGee explains. “You're able to look at older and older layers as you go down.”

Within those layers are—to name one example—the fossilized remains of foraminifera, plankton that have been around for hundreds of millions of years. “They happen to form small calcium carbonate shells,” says McGee. “And the composition of those shells is very strongly related to temperature. As the temperature gets hotter, the foraminifera become more sloppy chemists, and they allow more magnesium into their calcium carbonate shell.” If the foraminifera in a layer of sediment are rich in magnesium, that’s a sign that the world was warmer when that layer was formed.

Anything that contains oxygen can also be a good temperature record—including the calcium carbonate in ancient shells and bones, and the water molecules in layers of ice in Antarctica and Greenland. Not all oxygen in the atmosphere is alike: there are heavier and lighter “isotopes,” and they behave a little differently. Water containing the lighter 16O, for instance, evaporates faster. As a result, the abundance of 16O changes with temperature in predictable ways.

Paleoclimatologists also check ice and ocean sediments, and other records like stalagmites and tree rings, against each other to make sure they give consistent answers. “We combine evidence from all of these to get a full view of what Earth's temperature was in the past,” says McGee.

Temperature is not the only thing paleoclimatologists investigate. Some records teach us about ancient rainfall patterns, or gases in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is especially important: this is the main greenhouse gas driving today’s warming, so we can learn a lot about our changing climate from its history.

For the relatively recent past, scientists measure CO2 in real samples of ancient air, trapped in tiny bubbles in Antarctic ice. Those records go back about a million years. For earlier eras, ocean sediments come in handy again. As the amount of CO2 in the air rises and falls, the chemistry of seawater changes, and those changes can be reconstructed from what falls to the seafloor.

What have we learned from these records? For one, we can confirm the basic truth of climate change: whenever CO2 rises, temperatures will rise too, a pattern that has held for the past 100 million years.

But we can also get a preview of a warmer future. By the end of this century, if we don’t address our runaway CO2 emissions, we may see another two or three degrees Celsius of warming. There have been several past periods when the Earth’s temperature fell in this range. “And they look really, really different from today,” McGee says. “Sea levels were 30 or 40 feet higher, vegetation patterns were quite different, rainfall patterns were quite different. So they give us a sense that a few degrees is a big deal.”

Through a paleoclimatologist’s eyes, the Earth may look something like a sleeping giant: mostly predictable, but capable of sudden violence if it’s disturbed.

“I think what paleoclimate teaches us is that the Earth system is remarkably resilient,” says McGee. “It has been kicked around in a whole lot of ways throughout history. If it gets a big input of CO2, it does take that carbon and put it back into sediments, gradually, over about a million years, and come back somewhere close to where it started.”

But the adjustment period can be a harsh one. At the end of the last ice age, 17,000 years ago, the Earth warmed about 5.5° C over 7,000 years—about ten times slower than climate change today, but fast by the standards of the past. “And in that time period, we see the biggest rainfall changes that the world has seen in the last 100,000 years. The biggest droughts in West Africa, the biggest collapses of the Asian monsoon, the wettest times in South America, the wettest times in the American West. And all of this was happening not during the peak of the last ice age, when the temperature was the most different, but during this warming afterwards, when the world was adjusting to changing temperatures.”

“And so I think the Earth is going to be fine, in a few million years, regardless of what we do,” McGee adds. “It's really human society and the species we care about that are going to experience this disruption in the short term. And so the more we can limit the range of future warming, I think the more pain we protect ourselves from.”

 

Submit your own question to Ask MIT Climate

Get the latest from Ask MIT Climate monthly in your inbox

Read more Ask MIT Climate

 

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Footnotes

1 Osman, Matthew, et al. "Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum." Nature 599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4.

2 Kaufman, Darrell, et al. "Holocene global mean surface temperature, a multi-method reconstruction approach." Scientific Data 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0530-7.

3 Marcott, Shaun, et al. "A reconstruction of regional and global temperature for the past 11,300 years." Science 339 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228026.

Want to learn more?

Listen to this episode of MIT's "Today I Learned: Climate" podcast featuring Prof. David McGee.

Transcriptions

LHF: Hello, I’m Laur Hesse Fisher, and you’re listening to Today I Learned: Climate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Imagine, for a moment, that you’re standing on a massive sheet of ice that spans from the high Arctic, all the way into the northern United States. At its thickest point you could drill down through almost two miles of solid ice before reaching land. 

Today on our episode, we are going back in time to visit past versions of our Earth that are wildly different from today’s. 

And why? Well, because the Earth’s climate has changed before—many times before!—and folks like you have written in and asked us about it. What caused the Earth’s climate to change in the past? And what can it tell us about the climate change that we’re experiencing today?

Fortunately, we know someone at MIT who knows a lot about the history of the Earth’s climate.

DM: My name's David McGee, and I'm a professor in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT. And I study paleoclimate, which is the study of the natural history of Earth's climate.

LHF: It turns out that our planet has changed a lot before we humans came onto the scene. There was a time, for instance, when the whole center of North America was engulfed by an inland sea, a time when alligators crawled in the Arctic, and forests flourished near the south pole. 

And that’s because the Earth has gone through some wild changes in temperature.

DM: Even in the last 1% of Earth history, so last like 45 million years, we've seen changes in the Earth's mean temperature of roughly 30 to 40 degrees Fahrenheit. So huge changes in the mean global temperature.

LHF: But how do we know about these big changes in temperature? Well that, really, is the story of paleoclimate, and it begins in earnest in the 1700s, with some peculiar rocks.

DM: People had noticed boulders that didn't match the local bedrock, in places where it didn't really make sense that there should be boulders, in Scotland, Ireland, around eastern North America. They noticed striations or grooves in the bedrock. And they realized that these striations were things that were observed near modern glaciers. And so people started to piece together this story that there had been very large ice sheets in places where there weren't currently ice sheets.

LHF: In 1824, a geologist named Jens Esmark first proposed that these ice sheets were not just local, but a single vast mass of ice that once covered much of the Northern Hemisphere: in other words, that the world had undergone an ice age.

Over the next century, scientists would find more and more evidence proving his theory, eventually learning that, 20,000 years ago, a quarter of the Earth’s land surface was covered in ice, year round. And that raised a new question: just how cold was the Earth during this ice age? To answer that, scientists needed some extraordinary new tools.

DM: Paleoclimate is the art of the possible. You know, there's only so many things that you have that are left over from thousands of years ago, there's even fewer that are left over from millions of years ago, and even fewer from hundreds of millions of years ago.

So we have to rely upon natural archives, things that grow or are deposited and somehow record information about the climate around them as they form.

LHF: And these archives need to be preserved for a very long time. Scientists have only found a few of these relics of the deep past: often buried in unchanging environments, like Antarctic ice or sediments in the deep sea.

DM: And in both of these archives, you have deposits building up year after year after year. And if you're able to drill or core down into them, you essentially have a time machine.

I'll just give you an example. There is a certain type of plankton that lives in the surface ocean. These are called foraminifera, and they're about the size of a grain of sand. Really small. They happen to form small calcium carbonate shells. So just like a clam might, but they're so small that they're able to float around in the surface ocean.

LHF: And when the foraminifera die, their shells fall to the ocean floor and are preserved in layers of sediment. So what does that have to do with the temperature? Well, it turns out that foraminifera that grow in warmer waters build their shells a little differently.

DM: As the temperature gets hotter, the forams become more sloppy chemists and they allow more magnesium into their calcium carbonate shell. And so you can measure the magnesium to calcium ratio, and that's a very strong function of temperature.

LHF: And there are other time-traveling thermometers found in tree rings, ice cores, and stalagmites deep in caves. When you combine these separate lines of evidence, we can build a window into climates from long ago.

What’s more, when scientists tracked these temperature records further and further back in time, a surprising new picture appeared.

DM: They were able to see, oh wow, there hasn't just been one ice age. There's been this cycle going back and forth between ice ages and warmer periods.

So the earth has been going in and out of ice ages over the last million years at a rate of roughly one cycle per 100,000 years. So you'll have a period like the peak of the last ice age about 20,000 years ago. And then temperatures will rise into warm climates like we've enjoyed for the last 10 thousand years.

LHF: How? And why? Well, the answer, amazingly, lies not here on Earth, but out in the solar system.

So you might know that the Earth orbits the sun in an ellipsis—not a perfect circle. And the Earth is also tilted. At any time, one pole faces the sun—that’s the half of the Earth that experiences summer—and the other half faces away—that’s the Earth that experiences winter. But over thousands of years, that orbit and tilt… well, it shifts.

DM: The Earth's orbit gradually changes as we get pulled by the other planets in the solar system. And so the Earth's orbit becomes more elliptical or more circular through time. The Earth's tilt changes a little bit through time in a cyclical manner. 

LHF: And gradually, our north and south poles might find that, during the summer, they’re no longer tilted so strongly toward the sun.

DM: That decreases how much sunlight comes into the Arctic during local summer and makes it harder to melt away the previous winter’s snow and ice, and it builds up and builds up and builds up, and eventually forms an ice sheet.

So, then the question is, okay, you're building up some ice sheets in Northern Canada and Scandinavia. Why does that make the whole world cold? The real reason that ice ages are a global phenomenon is because, as you grow an ice sheet, the ice sheet changes ocean circulation in such a way that more carbon dioxide gets stored in the deep ocean rather than sticking around in the atmosphere.

LHF: You probably remember that CO2 is the most important of the heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere that are causing today’s climate change. And throughout Earth’s history there’s been a close relationship between the average temperature of our planet and the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere. Now, scientists use the tools of paleoclimate to look at how much CO2 was in the air during the ice ages. In fact, we can actually measure directly the air of the ancient past—because some of it is still around.

DM: In Antarctica in particular, as the snow builds up and then gets compressed beneath other layers of snow above it and gradually turns into ice, it traps little bubbles of air. And that air is pristine samples of the ancient atmosphere. And so scientists will collect these ice cores, bring them back to the lab, and then measure directly how much carbon dioxide is in the air from times in the past.

LHF: That’s really cool. All right, so let’s recap. So the Earth shifts slightly in space over thousands of years, making the Arctic summer darker and colder. And ice sheets form and spread, and the ocean circulation changes. This traps CO2 deep in the ocean, and because there is less heat-trapping CO2 in the atmosphere, the entire planet begins to cool.

DM: And so it's quite a chain of events that leads from the changes in Earth's orbit to the ice ages themselves.

LHF: So how much do these changes add up? Well, in the last ice age, which was 20,000 years ago, CO2 in the atmosphere fell by about a third. So do you want to guess how much the Earth cooled as a result?

DM: We now know that in the peak of the last Ice Age, it was about 10 degrees Fahrenheit colder than it was during pre-industrial times.

LHF: Did you guess correctly? Or were you way off? Maybe you’re asking yourself now—wait, what? Just ten degrees? Isn’t that the difference between a chilly fall day and a crisp spring afternoon?

DM: Yeah, it's really striking to me how different the world was, given only 10 degrees Fahrenheit difference in mean temperatures. So, where I'm sitting around Boston, Massachusetts, would have had about a mile of ice on top of me right now. 

LHF: From just 10 degrees of cooling! (Which is about five and a half degrees Celsius, by the way.) But this is the crucial difference between weather and climate. If the weather changes by 10 degrees, well, you put on a jacket. But if the average climate changes by 10 degrees… well, you’ve got the planet where woolly mammoths roamed as far south as Illinois and Spain. 

DM: And then slow changes in Earth's orbit gradually increase how much summer sunlight there is in the Arctic and start to melt back those ice sheets and the changes go in reverse. So the ocean circulation responds and allows carbon dioxide that has been stored in the deep ocean to come back into the atmosphere.

LHF: And those rising CO2 levels warm the entire world. Like they are today.

Except, not quite like today. We really are living through something that’s different now. So for one thing, today’s climate change is timed all wrong. The Earth’s position in space is not setting us up for more warming.

DM: The variations in Earth's orbit are fairly subtle right now, and then they'll get larger over the next few tens of thousands of years. So if there weren't human-caused climate change, we would eventually go back into another ice age.

LHF: And a huge difference between the end of the last ice age, and today’s warming—is how fast it’s happening.

DM: So if you look at the warming coming out of the last ice age, temperatures were low until about 17,000 years ago, and then CO2 started to rise and global temperatures started to rise. And they rose that 10 degrees Fahrenheit in about 7,000 years. Modern temperature change is about 10 times faster.

LHF: Which means that today, we’re facing climate change at a speed that even our distant, nomadic ancestors in the ice age never confronted. Let alone the more recent humans who laid the foundations of civilization as we know it.

DM: The last 10,000 years have been a period of stability in global temperatures. And that period of stability has coincided with the growth of complex human societies and the shift to agriculture as the basis for human society and you know, dramatic expansions in human population. And this I think is more than a coincidence.

LHF: It’s true that the Earth has gone through immense climate change before, many times over, in fact. But human civilization… has not. And especially not this fast.

Today, we are the ones changing the balance of our atmosphere. And we’re the ones who get to decide. Do we want to rapidly shake our planet loose from the stability that we’ve always known? Or will we be happier, and safer, if we act to preserve the climate in which humanity has flourished for the last ten thousand years?

That is our show today. Thank you to everyone who sent us in questions about the ice ages. You can send us your own question by leaving us a voicemail message at 617 253 3566 or visiting https://climate.mit.edu/ask.

Today I Learned: Climate is the climate change podcast of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aaron Krol is our Writer and Executive Producer. David Lishansky is our Sound Editor and Producer. Michelle Harris is our fact-checker. The music is by Blue Dot Sessions. And I’m your Host and Senior Editor, Laur Hesse Fisher. 

Thank you Prof. David McGee for speaking with us, and to all of you, for listening. Keep up your climate curiosity.